The
|
|
|
Updated March 26, 2010 PRK Enterprises, Inc. v. Google, ET. AL.
This past September, PRK Enterprises, Inc., the parent company of the Southeast Texas Political Review, filed a lawsuit against Google, Inc., as well as the owners and operators of Blogger.com, Operation Kleinwatch blog, and Sam The Eagle (et.al.) blog. This lawsuit is a cumulative result post investigation and cooperation with the said investigation with the Federal Government regarding these said sites and those to who operate them. PRK Enterprises, Inc., alleges and continues to allege that these sites have violated and continue to violate the digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, 17 USC Section 512. The purpose of this page is to keep the public and media informed regarding this lawsuit and the filings presented to the court regarding all parties involved. The Timeline of Events March 2005 A web site posts onto the Internet Calls "SETPOLITICS" which begins a long process of incorporating copyrighted material as well posting images of members of the Klein family. In the same month - another site called "Sam The Eagle" announces itself in a yahoo blog site. Both state publicly that each site is autonomous of each other and there is no communication between the parties. July 2005 After the Yahoo site is objected to by the parent company and their counsel of the SET Political Review - another web site is discovered in production - not yet announced. This said site is called "Klein-The-Idiot.TV. The said site is to be hosted by KATZ Global in Arizona. During the course and scope of the investigation by two private firms and a federal agency - it is discovered that there is a "talk board" that is being used by the owner of a web site called "Americanskeptic.com" - to which this web sites Registered Owner is a Neil Harrison. This site is tracked down post a mistake in publishing the "talk board" by Harrison and the entry and exit points are tracked being both at a private residence as well as Clear Channel Communications in Beaumont, Texas. Clear Channel is advised of such as well as copyrighted voice sounds being downloaded by Clear Channel computers and Mr. Harrison's private computer. The "talk board" is monitored by investigators and agents for a period of 14 days post discovery and entries are downloaded daily - and the parties are indicated in violation of civil and possible criminal laws as follows : Actual Messages Posted Regarding "Conspiracy Admissions", copyright admissions, stealing the copyrighted web site design, "spamming" email listed owned by the Review, and taking copyrighted information and re-publishing of such. The KIT Message Board : Lawsuit - Federal Docs - Multi0001.pdf During this time - KATZ Global is contacted and cooperates with both private and federal investigators. They provide to both documents from a request for a web access and address - sent by US Mail by fraudulent means. The addresses are searched and as well the money order is searched and tracked back to a Wayne Wilber of Hampshire Texas. Mr. Wilber is contacted but refuses to cooperate with civil investigators. The Request To Katz Global : Lawsuit - Katz Global - Wayne Wilber0001.pdf Fall 2005 SET Politics Closes and other websites begin to emerge. However, the other web sites follow the law over the next year and six months. Summer 2007 Within three weeks of each other - two blog sites appear through announcements laid out in the discovered documents of July 2005. They are "Operation Kleinwatch" and "Sam The Eagle" blogspots. Both clearly violate the digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, 17 USC Section 512. Google USA is contact by counsel and documentation is requested for IP addresses to begin in anticipation of litigation. Google Security cooperates. September 2007 A letter is received by the law firm that represents the Klein Companies from the US Attorney in Lufkin, Texas. Upon reading such - it is determined that the letter is a fraudulent letter and is bagged and taken by the FBI office in Beaumont, Texas. Subsequent identifiers are noted by testing of the letter and an investigation is opened regarding the identity of the writer. Such was completed in March of 2009. The Letter To Klein's Attorney : Lawsuit - USDJ-FBI Doc10001.pdf Year 2008 Violations of the MCA continue - with requests to Google USA to intervene. They refuse stating the 1st amendment issues and a lawsuit in New York that had been filed mirroring the same claims. The reference is the State of New York : Liskulula;, petitioner v. Google, Inc. August 2009 The New York case is decided and the New York Supreme Court upholds the verdict and demands that Google, Inc. release the name (s) of the blog site editors to the plaintiff. One last letter of request is made to Google - a public statement is posted in demand letter both to Google and to the two blogspot owners. September / October 2009 Post no response from any of the parties - a lawsuit is filed - and expanded under Rule 202 of the TRCP against Google, Inc., operationkleinwatch, samtheagleusa, and expanded to a link site post samtheagleusa's abandonment of the site. All parties are served. Lawsuit : Lawsuit - Original Petition - PRK ETAL0001.pdf At the end of September both parties meeting - being Google and the lawyers for Klein. A rule 11 agreement is made to release the names under subpoena, however, Google would forward the information to the blogspot operators and they would have option under their own to hire counsel and file motions to quash the subpoenas. They had until October 5, 2009 to do so. Further, two letters of request for cooperation are mailed to Wayne Wilber and Neil Harrison. Wilber refuses to cooperate and an attorney with the law firm of Brent Coon and Associates, the same firm that represented Judge Tom Gilliam, advises that they will represent Neil Harrison. Federal officials are notified of such. During this time - two download sites for EMAIL and Sound Holdings are contacted. They agree outside of suit to cooperate with investigators. They give information regarding access and IP addresses for uploads and use of radio show information copyrighted for the SET Political Review. As well, IP addresses for skip mail addresses for both Operationkleinwatch and samtheagleusa et.al. sites. It is found that both are operating and communicated as prior noted. As well, both sites are again linked to each other. As well, one IP address is again noted for Clear Channel Communications. A third web site agrees to cooperate in giving the legal team and investigators all IP addresses passed through their site from Operationkleinwatch over the past four months since the site posted a link to an anonymous IP address block site. Such was received on October 5, 2009 in an agreement not to litigate. October 2009 On October 5, 2009, two motions to quash were filed : Sam The Eagle Motion, et.al. to Quash : Lawsuit - STE Motion To Quash0001.pdf Operation Kleinwatch Motion To Quash : Lawsuit - OKW Moiton To Quash0001.pdf December 2009 On December 22, 2009, Klein attorneys filed their response and oral arguments have been scheduled for January 15, 2009. Response To Motion To Quash : Rsp to Respondent's Mtn to Quash Subpoena.pdf Notice Of Hearing : NOH-Rsp to Mtn to Quash.pdf January 15, 2010 A hearing is held on the Motion to Quash by STE and OKW. Nobody shows and testimony is taken. The judge denies the Motion To Quash and orders all information to all three blog site with history back to 2004 to be given to the plaintiff's. Such process is begun. Later in the week, two filings are made by Operation Klein Watch and Sam The Eagle which are located here : Req. for Findings of Fact and Concl of Law.pdf The filing is ignored by the court because it is simply not filed legally. The information is again ordered to be released on January 25, 2010. The court issues the following determination : Signed Amended Order Denying Mtn to Quash.pdf February 26, 2010 After being served with the order from the court, Google receives from STE and OKW, a notice of appeal to the 9th circuit court. The filing is not filed legally and outside the scope of the law. No appeal is filed with the 9th circuit in the time limits of law. Google informs counsel for Klein that they will not comply with the Rule 11 agreement previously signed by Google and its legal Counsel until the court can rule on the notice of appeal. Google is given five days to comply with the rule 11 agreement. Google refuses. Klein files an amended petition moving the case from a 202 case to a full lawsuit against Google requesting damages and attorneys fees and sanctions. As well, a deposition notice to Google to which they are ordered to appear and answer. March 2010 Google answers the transfer of suit from a 202 to a lawsuit. As well, files a motion to quash the lawsuit and wants the case moved to California for deposition. A hearing will be scheduled. Mtn for Protective Order & Mtn to Quash.pdf The Review makes the decision to file a motion to strike - and a hearing is scheduled for all parties on March 26, 2010. Mtn to Strike Findings of Fact & Conc of Law.pdf The Defendants file an answer with three days before the hearing not even naming the parties to the suit correctly : Lawsuit - Answer Response M26100001.pdf On March 26, 2010, a hearing is had in court. Nobody shows up other than the plaintiffs (Klein's attorney). The motions in question are defaulted for Klein and now considerations for attorney fees will be submitted to the court against both parties in the amount of $10,000 for filing response and failing to show up to three hearings. Evidence is introduced that the defendants are stalling for time. Google states to Klein's attorney that they are ready to release the information - and will post appeal. The judge orders a brief for expedition of proceedings be in his office by Klein by Monday. He will rule on Monday afternoon for expedited release. Further, a motion is prepared for expedited ruling by the appeals court - without brief since the defendants have now passed on three hearings without showing up. Brief will be filed on Monday March 29, 2010. Google attorney's state that they do not represent the bloggers and would like to release the said information immediately. The judge takes the consideration under advisement and will rule Monday. April 2010 On April 27, 2010, the Review filed a response to a request for emergency stay from Operation Kleinwatch and Sam The Eagle. According to filings for the Emergency Stay - both parties (together) have hired legal counsel in Houston. This has happened post errors being made by the party and the trial court issuing notice for attorney fees for Klein. Here is the response to the request for emergency orders : Response to Mtn for Emergency Stay.pdf May 2010 On May 26, 2010, the Klein attorney's file legal documents with the court after Google attorney's file a motion to dismiss the objections to the subpoenas offering them to the plaintiffs. The judge accepts the motion - and asks that all proper documents and answers be filed to the appeals court. Klein's attorney's agree - and notice a demand post dismissal of the objections to turn over the documents that are now in camera. The move by Google's attorney is a surprise to all parties. Reply Brief Part 1.pdf - Klein's Brief (moot) to appeals court pt 1 Reply Brief Part 2.pdf - Klein's Brief (moot) to appeals court pt 1 June 2010 As the information was being prepared for counsel for Klein, on June 4, 2010, the new counsel for the defendants, Mr. Dorrell of Houston, Texas files an emergency request for a stay to Judge Floyd in the supreme court. The stay is granted with one hour before the information is to be released to the plaintiffs. In the stay order there is a request for briefings from both sides. All briefings are due in July. Clearly, if either side wins the case moves to the Supreme Court of the United States. Mr. Dorrell issues a press release to left wing blog sites which is not picked up by the mainstream media - only underground blog sites and one legal site. July 2010 Counsel for STE and OKW refuse and pass to file a brief. Counsel for Klein files their brief in front of the Texas Supreme Court on July 12, 2010. Counsel for STE and OKW file a response barley under the deadline. Current Lawsuit Status The Federal Lawsuit is drafted and is still ready. The brief is in front of the Texas Supreme Court. Sam and Gus filed their answer. UPDATE : July 30, 2010
Readers Note : Please understand that the information above is the public information. There may be other issues that are not being released to the public for litigation reasons - and / or for trial attorney client work product reasons. The purpose of this web page is to inform the readers of this site of progression of the suit.
|
|
The Southeast Texas Political Review is a production of Klein and Associates Political Relations. © 1995 - 2010 PRK Enterprises, Inc. Any rebroadcast or reproduction of this site is forbidden without permission of this Company. Such permission must be in writing and consist of the persons name - address - and the reason for the reproduction. Under title 17 of the US Code - Subjects that reproduce or reprint any portion of this site without permission of PRK Enterprises, Inc. may be liable under the statute. For comments - questions - or requests for reproduction of quotes or stories as written in this site, please E-Mail us at SETREVIEW@gtbizclass.com., or mail us at the address listed on this site. |